Allowed

Jagwant Kumar Sharma v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Dec 2017CWP/20662/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondents to calculate and disburse pecuniary benefits accrued to the petitioner in terms of a prior judgment (Hari Chand case) within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to calculate and disburse pecuniary benefits accrued to the petitioner in terms of Hari Chand's case within two months.

Jagwant Kumar Sharma Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CWP No. 20662 OF 2016

¶2

--1--

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP No. 20662 OF 2016 DECIDED ON: DECEMBER 20, 2017

¶5

JAGWANT KUMAR SHARMA

¶6

.....PETITIONER

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

¶9

.....RESPONDENTS

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

¶11

Present: Mr. Rishab Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶12

Ms. Devaki Anand Sullar, AAG, Punjab.

¶13

¶14

JASPAL SINGH, J.

¶15

By virtue of instant petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing order dated 13.06.2016 (Annexure P-4) to the extent that petitioner is not entitled for full amount and whereby a meagre amount of 13,31,161/- has been sanctioned and further directing the respondents to consider the medical claims and reimburse the amount of 27,14,077/- along with interest @ 18% per annum.

¶16

Concededly, the case of the petitioner is fully covered with the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No. 5714 of 2014 , captioned as “Hari

¶17

Chand v. State of Punjab and others”, decided on 06.01.2016 (Annexure P-5). It being so, the petitioner is also entitled to the same relief, which has been

¶18

Sonika granted to the petitioner in Hari Chand's case (supra). 2018.02.06 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

--2--

¶20

CWP No. 20662 OF 2016

¶21

Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to calculate and disburse the pecuniary benefits accrued to the petitioner in terms of Hari Chand's case (supra) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶22

However, in case of non-compliance of order of this Court, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

¶23

DECEMBER 20, 2017 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE

¶24

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No

¶25

Sonika 2018.02.06 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Jagwant Kumar Sharma v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagwant Kumar Sharma v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balkaran Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Budh Ram Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Vijay Constructions Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

M/S Jaswant Rai Verma Vs State of Punjab and Others

Jagmal Singh Vs State of Haryana & Others

The Seed Farm Co. Op L &C Society Vs Punjab Water Resources Management and Development Corporation and Ors.