Petitioner in a constitutional petition sought withdrawal to file applications under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, which the court allowed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate applications under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Manoj Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2017.10.12 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
CWP No.20531 of 2017 Date of Order: 09.10.2017
Leela Dhar
....Petitioner
Versus
F.C, Haryana and Ors.
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for
some time, prays for withdrawal of the petition in order to file appropriate applications, in terms of provisions of Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
October 09, 2017 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Leela Dhar
F.C, Haryana
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
