The court set aside the Debts Recovery Tribunal's order dismissing the petitioners' appeal under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act as premature and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for decision on merit.
The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for decision on merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CWP No. 18747 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 18747 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.11.2017
M/s Yogesh Enterprises and others
.. Petitioners
versus
Vijaya Bank and another
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill
Present: Mr. Rohit Suri, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Kamal Preet Singh Dhillon, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
The petitioners have challenged the order dated 23.3.2017 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh (for short, 'the Tribunal'), whereby SA No.191/2017 filed by the petitioners impugning the action taken by the Bank under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, was dismissed as premature relying upon the judgment of DRAT, Delhi in Misc. Appeal No.60/16 titled as Vikram Bakshi & Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. & others, decided on 20.3.2017.
Short submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners is
that the aforesaid judgment of DRAT, Delhi has been stayed by Delhi High
Sharmila Devi 2017.11.17 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-2-
CWP No. 18747 of 2017
Court in W.P. (C) 2966 of 2017 titled as Vikram Bakshi & Company Pvt.Ltd. vs. Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. & others on 10.4.2017. He further referred to the order passed by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions with main order in CWP-COM No.62 of 2017 titled as M/s Hall Mark Steel Pvt. Ltd. and others vs. Federal Bank and others, decided on 21.4.2017, whereby under identical circumstances, order passed by DRT was set aside. The matters were remitted back. Reference has also been made to the order passed in CWP No.18721 of 2017 titled as Mohinder Singh and another vs. HDFC Bank and another, decided on 31.8.2017. The prayer is that the order passed by the Tribunal be set aside and the matter be remitted back to be decided on merit. He further submitted that the possession of the property of the petitioners was sought to be taken for default in payment of ` 75,27,818.76/- as on 30.9.2016.
On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.1, while not disputing the aforesaid orders passed by this Court submitted that the matter may be considered by this Court on merits instead of remitting it back.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the earlier orders passed by this Court in M/s Hall Mark Steel Pvt. Ltd. and Mohinder Singh's cases (supra), in our view, the impugned order dated 23.3.2017 (Annexure P-1) deserves to be set aside.
Ordered accordingly.
The matter is remitted back to the Tribunal for decision on merit. The parties through their counsels are directed to appear before the
Sharmila Devi 2017.11.17 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No. 18747 of 2017
-3-
Tribunal on 5.12.2017.
The petition stands disposed of.
| (Rajesh Bindal) Judge |
||
|---|---|---|
| (Gurvinder Singh Gill) Judge |
||
| 14.11.2017 | ||
| sharmila | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable |
: Yes/No : Yes/No |
Sharmila Devi 2017.11.17 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dismissing the RERA appeal as premature merits remitting the matter to the Tribunal for decision on merit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vikram Bakshi & Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd.Distinguished¶14
Vikram Bakshi & Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. & others, DRAT, Delhi, Misc. Appeal No.60/16
Vikram Bakshi & Company Pvt.Ltd. vs. Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd.Explained¶16
W.P. (C) 2966 of 2017 Vikram Bakshi & Company Pvt.Ltd. vs. Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. & others
M/s Yogesh Enterprises and others
Vijaya Bank
Rajesh Bindal
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
