Daria S/O Asha Ram v. Deputy Commissioner Jind
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.17833 of 1994 Date of Decision.20.01.2017
Dariya s/o Asha Ram
.......Petitioner
Vs
The Deputy Commissioner, Jind and others
........Respondents
Present: Mr. Chirag Kundu, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Kundu, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause of action survives in the writ petition. The writ petition has become infructuous and seeks dismissal of the same as such.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
January 20, 2017 Pankaj*
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.01.23 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Dariya s/o Asha Ram
The Deputy Commissioner, Jind
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court