Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.14390 of 2016 Date of decision:04.05.2017
Suneela Devi
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner after having obtained instructions from his client seeks leave of the Court for withdrawal of the present writ petition.
In view of the aforementioned, the present writ petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 04, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Savita 2017.05.04 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Suneela Devi
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
