This is a thin order where the petitioner sought an expedited decision on a dismissal application regarding ROR No.754 of 2016. The court directed the Financial Commissioner to dispose of the matter within one month.
Directions issued to the Financial Commissioner to decide ROR No.754 of 2016 expeditiously within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.12765 of 2017 Date of Decision.02.06.2017
Amrik Singh
........Petitioner
Vs
State of Punjab and another
........Respondents
Present: Mr. Maninder Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL)
The petitioner, who was respondent, in the application for seeking dismissal of the ROR bearing No.754 of 2016, submits hat the arguments in the aforementioned matter had already been addressed on 28.03.2017 but no order has been passed.
He further submits that his client would be satisfied in case is direction is issued to the Financial Commissioner, who seized of the proceedings, to decide the application for dismissal of the ROR as expeditiously as possible.
Without going into the merits and demerits of the matter, I deem it appropriate to issue direction to the Financial Commissioner, who seized of the proceedings, to decide the application for dismissal of the aforementioned ROR as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one month from today.
The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
June 02, 2017 Pankaj*
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.07.03 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Amrik Singh
State of Punjab
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
