water course. There was huge problem of seepage of water from the kacha watercourses and due to which, they along with other farmers of the area were suffering from huge financial losses owing to the loss of crop. Respondent No.2 had undertaken the construction of the aforementioned project. The said project of Community Underground Pipeline is being run by the Government under NABARD Scheme in which 90% of the costs is to be paid by the Government and 10% by the farmers. As per the site plan (Annexure P-2) at page 24, it reveals that the said project was prepared for the entire outlet (Mogha) aforementioned. However, (Annexure P-7), site plan is not in consonance with the original one. Underground pipeline approved, vetted and sanctioned is thus, totally illegal. The action of the respondent-authorities commencing partial construction is un-sustainable in the eyes of law. The entire process being carried out by the respondents cannot be held to be sustainable as they are mis-using the public funds, thus, the villagers who were required to pay 10% of the costs have been deceited by changing the course and thus, urges this Court for issuing appropriate directions to the respondent-authorities by quashing the Annexures P-6 and P-7.
