Petitioner withdrew this writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate authorities. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty to approach the appropriate authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.12185 of 2017 Date of decision: 20.07.2017
Ramandeep Kaur
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Ms. G.K. Mann , Advocate for the petitioner.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ
petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authorities.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
20.07.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
Neetu Rani 2017.07.21 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Ramandeep Kaur
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
