Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn following a compromise between parties, with liberty to revive the petition if cause of action survives.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive it if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.11731 of 2013 Date of decision:07.02.2017
Ruldu Ram
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. S.S.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Singh Mann, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Ashwani, Advocate for respondents No.5 and 6.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court for withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that the parties have entered into compromise, therefore, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition with liberty to revive the same in case something survives.
In view of the aforementioned, the present writ petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 07, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Savita 2017.02.08 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Ruldu Ram
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
