Dismissed

Ajaib Singh & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Appeals Punjab Chandigarh and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC23 May 2017CWP/11329/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged partition proceedings regarding evacuee land. The Court held that no right to partition accrues until the petitioners' ownership is finalized by decree and the sale deed is set aside in the pending civil appeal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed; impugned orders were held legal and justified.

Ajaib Singh & Ors. Vs Financial… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CWP No.11329 of 2017

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP No.11329 of 2017 Date of decision:23.05.2017

¶5

Ajaib Singh and others

¶6

... Petitioners

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Financial Commissioner, Appeals, Punjab and others ... Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶10

Present:Mr. G.S.Sirphikhi, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶11

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)

¶12

The petitioner – Ajaib Singh and others have challenged the partition proceedings in respect of land of which they are owners.

¶13

The grievance of Mr. Sirphikhi, Advocate is that the land measuring 7 kanals 4 marlas bearing khasra No.5R/13/2 was in the ownership of grandfather of the petitioners but Tehsildar declared the property to be evacuee which was sold to Hakam Singh, alleged tenant way back in the year 1998. The civil suit was dismissed by the trial Court, vide judgment and decree dated 16.05.2012 but the appeal is pending adjudication. He further submits that partition proceedings could not have been initiated as it would be hit by doctrine akin to partial partition.

¶14

I am afraid the aforementioned argument is fallacious and not sustainable on the ground that until and unless the petitioners and others are

¶15

Savita 2017.05.26 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶16

CWP No.11329 of 2017

¶17

{2}

¶18

not declared owners by virtue of decree in respect of aforementioned khasra number and succeed in setting aside the sale deed, no right enures/accrues seeking partition of the aforementioned land but as and when they will succeed, shall be at liberty to seek partition but not at this stage or can keep the partition proceedings in abeyance.

¶19

In view of the aforementioned observations, the impugned orders are perfectly legal and justified, much less no interference is warranted.

¶20

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

¶21

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 23, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶22

Savita 2017.05.26 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Ajaib Singh & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Appeals Punjab Chandigarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajaib Singh & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Appeals Punjab Chandigarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Chander Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Biaso Devi and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Satinderbir Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Permanent Lok Adalat Utility Services & Anr.

Kashmir Singh and Ors. Vs Municipal Council Samana

M/S Dream Land and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.