Dismissed
Sukhjinder Singh v. Superintending Canal Officer and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/10607/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.10607 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.12.01.2017
Sukhjinder Singh
........Petitioner
Vs
Superintendent Canal Officer and others
........Respondents
Present: Mr. Naresh Kumar Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
The counsel for the petitioner has approached this Court against the impugned order (Annexure P-12) on the premise that no notice of motion or further date has been given in the proceedings initiated under Section 68 of the Northern India Canal & Drainage Act, 1873. After having acquired the knowledge of the aforementioned fact, instead of approaching the authority, he has straightforward approached this Court.
It is strange that once the order under challenge has come into notice of the petitioner, nothing prevented him in moving application for listing the aforementioned matter and moving any application for seeking vacation of the stay.
At this stage, Mr. Manchanda seeks liberty of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition to take the remedy as noticed above. Ordered accordingly. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
January 12, 2017 Pankaj*
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.01.16 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sukhjinder Singh
Superintendent Canal Officer
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court