The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition on the ground of delay and laches, as the impugned order was passed more than three years prior.
The writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 10042 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.5.2017
Sukhwinder Singh and others
.. Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ramendra Jain
Present: Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
The order impugned in the present petition is dated 17.10.2013. The present petition having been filed more than three years after the passing of the impugned order deserves to be dismissed on account of delay and laches only.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
(Ramendra Jain) Judge 11.5.2017 sharmila Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sharmila Devi 2017.05.12 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sukhwinder Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
Rajesh Bindal
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
