Rashid v. State of Up and Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's challenge was disposed of because the marriage of his niece was already solemnized, rendering the petition infructuous.
Petitioner's challenge was disposed of because the marriage of his niece was already solemnized, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Writ Petition No.901 of 2017(O&M)
Date of Decision: August 17 , 2017.
Rashid
...... PETITIONER (s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: Mr. A.S.Trikha, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay K.Saini, AAG, Haryana.
LISA GILL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the marriage of the petitioner's niece has already been solemnized on 12.08.2017, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
( LISA GILL ) August 17 , 2017. JUDGE ‘om’
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
Omkar Singh 2017.08.18 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Rashid
State of Haryana
Lisa Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court