Allowed

Azad Singh v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC16 Mar 2017CRM-M/5407/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Azad Singh in an NDPS case involving recovery of ganja. Petitioner was released on bond subject to standard conditions including surrender and non-exit from the country.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail upon furnishing bond and surety to satisfaction of trial court, complying with conditions of Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

Azad Singh Vs State of Haryana — Narcotics (NDPS) | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CRM-M-5407 of 2017

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

CRM-M-5407 of 2017 Date of Decision: 16.03.2017

Azad Singh

....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent

¶9

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶10

Present: Mr. S.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

¶12

¶13

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 239 dated 19.07.2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Station Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra, District Kurukshetra. Heard.

¶15

As per case of prosecution, 13 kgs. 270 gms. of 'ganja' was recovered form the vehicle bearing registration no. HR-36-K-9194 and the petitioner alongwith other occupants of the vehicle were arrested on 20.07.2016.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the other occupants of the vehicle were allowed regular bail by the Court of Sessions and application of this petitioner was declined on the short ground that it has been filed at very early stage.

¶17

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner was owner of the

¶18

Jitender Kumar 2017.03.16 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

¶19

CRM-M-5407 of 2017

¶20

-2-

¶21

vehicle from which recovery of ganja was effected.

¶22

Recovery of contraband effected in this case is of noncommercial quantity and keeping in view the fact that co-accused have already been allowed benefit of regular bail, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. PetitionerAzad Singh is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:-

¶23

(a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶24

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

¶25

¶26

March 16, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE

¶27

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶28

Jitender Kumar 2017.03.16 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

Azad Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Azad Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjan Waffa Vs State of Punjab

Surinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Anjali Jaggi and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Tannu Sharma & Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Amarjit Kaur and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sukhwant Kaur @ Sukhi Vs State of Punjab and Another