The petition was dismissed as rendered infructuous because the underlying FIR was quashed in a separate order passed on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-41058 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 02, 2017
Jai Bhagwan
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Haryana
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Bikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Ms. Harpreet Kaur, A.A.G. Haryana.
Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate for complainant.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties submit that FIR in this case has since been quashed vide separate order of even date passed in CRM-M No.33995 of 2016, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as rendered infructuous.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) March 02, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Sachin Mehta 2017.03.03 12:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
Jai Bhagwan
State of Haryana
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
