Petitioner, present neither personally nor through counsel, was absent from the hearing. The High Court dismissed the petition due to non-prosecution after the prescribed time.
None; petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of the party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-39687 of 2015
Date of Decision: 01.08.2017
Amandeep Kumar @ Aman Kamboj ...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: None for petitioners.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The case has been called several times since morning but none
has appeared for petitioners. Its over 03.30 p.m. by now.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) August 01, 2017 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Jitender Kumar 2017.08.02 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
Amandeep Kumar @ Aman Kamboj
State of Punjab
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
