Allowed

Jinda Hassan v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC28 Mar 2017CRM-M/3109/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge Bench of Surinder Gupta, J., allowed an order for anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC. The decision was made without expressing an opinion on merits upon submission that the matter was amicable settled and co-accused were already on bail. The petitioner was directed to surrender and join investigation within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; petitioner directed to surrender and join investigation within two weeks subject to bail bond and surety bond.

Jinda Hassan Vs State of Haryana — Cheque Dishonour | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

-1-

¶2

CRM-M-3109 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-3109 of 2017 Date of Decision: 28.03.2017

Jinda Hassan

....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent

¶9

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶10

Present: Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

¶12

¶13

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 271 dated 07.07.2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), at Police Station Ganaur, District Sonipat.

¶15

Heard.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has since been amicably settled between the parties and co-accused Dr. Harun and Alamdin @ Alam have already been allowed regular and anticipatory bail vide orders dated 02.03.2017, passed in CRM-M-3927-2017 and CRMM-27495-2016, respectively.

¶17

In view of above but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioner is directed to surrender before the police and join investigation within two weeks. In the event of his arrest being required, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till the presentation

¶18

Jitender Kumar 2017.03.28 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

¶19

CRM-M-3109 of 2017

¶20

-2-

¶21

of challan, subject to his furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer, on following terms:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶24

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

¶25

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

¶26

March 28, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶27

Jitender Kumar 2017.03.28 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

Jinda Hassan v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jinda Hassan v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amandeep Kaur Alias Pinky Alias Aman Vs State of Punjab

Kuldeep Vs State of Haryana

Shammi Vs State of Punjab

Tejinder Pal Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Krishan Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Rahul @ Raldu Vs State of Haryana