Allowed
Binderpal Sharma v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/30443/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-30443-2017
Date of decision: 01.11.2017
Binderpal Sharma
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. MS Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rana Harjasdeep Singh, AAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
In the instant petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 0065 dated 06.08.2017 registered under Section 61 of the Excise Act at Police Station Sadar, Sunam, District Sangrur.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Gurtej Singh, states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him nor he is required for further custodial interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 21.08.2017 passed by this Court is made absolute.
The petition stands disposed of, accordingly.
November 01, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2017.11.01 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Binderbal Sharma
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court