An oral judgment wherein the petitioner's counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The Court dismissed the petition on this ground without delivering a reasoned order.
Petition dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-29880-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.09.2017
Hardip Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr.Suneet Singh Deol, Advocate, for Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL)
Learned proxy counsel for the petitioners contends that with the
efflux of time the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
25.09.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned No. Whether reportable No.
Hardip Singh and others
State of Punjab and another
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
