Bail petition under Section 439 CrPC filed against Sections 307, 324, 323, 452 IPC became infructuous as the underlying FIR was quashed in a connected petition on the same date. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Petition disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM-M-26997 of 2016 Date of Decision: 27.02.2017
Gudpal Singh ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab ....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal , Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Jashanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 88 dated 23.07.2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 307, 324, 323, 452 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') at Police Station Goindwal Sahib District Tarn Taran
Heard.
As the instant FIR has been ordered to be quashed vide order of even date passed in connected petition (CRM-M-29080 of 2016), the instant petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of as such.
February 27, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Jitender Kumar 2017.02.28 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gudpal Singh
State of Punjab
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
