“2. Brief facts of the case of the complaint are that accused/respondent is prop. firm namely Malik Power Transmission & Civil Contractors Aggarwal Bhawan Near Railway Crossing and Mandir, Narela, New Delhi through Prop. Bijender Singh S/o Hari Singh R/o Near Sindhu Border, Village Hamidpur Delhi. The complainant is also a partner orally in the above said firm which had been working for installing electric transformer on various places. The complainant is permanent resident of village Gudha, Tehsil & District Jhajjar and the complainant also invested some money in the above said firm with the accused/respondent. The respondent/accused have to pay Rs.10,00,000/- to the complainant in view of compromise took place between the parties before respectable on dated 02.11.2010. In view of compromise mentioned above the accused/respondent have issued a cheque no.290 dated 04.02.2011of Rs. 10,00,000/-of Bank of India, Branch Bakhtawarpur,New Delhi-36 in favour of the complainant namely Shri Bhagwan and above said cheque was presented by the complainant to H.K.G.B., Jhajjar on dated 16.03.2011. But the same was dishonored by the Bank of India, Jhajjar vide dated 17.03.2011 with the remark in sufficient funds and returned to the bank HKGB, Jhajjar. The complainant received dishonored cheque stated above and other paper from the HKGB, Jhajjar on dated 11.04.2011. The complainant informed the accused/respondent about the dishonoring the cheque issued by him. But no satisfactory reply was given by the accused/respondent to the complainant. The complainant also sent a registered notice to the accused/respondent at the office address as well as on the home address. The respondent deliberately not received the registered letter sent to the office address and the respondent received the registered letter which was sent to him at the home address but he did not reply the notice up to date. Hence, in spite of service of the legal notice the accused/respondent have failed to pay the cheque amount to the complainant and thus the accused/respondent have committed an offence punishable U/s 138 read with 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act”
