Dismissed
Rohtash and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/18687/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-30681-2017 in CRM-M-18687-2017(O&M)
Date of decision: 28.09.2017
Rohtash and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate, for the petitioners.
JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL)
CRM-30681-2017
This is an application that has been preferred for withdrawal of
CRM-M-18687-2017 filed on the ground that the matter stands compromised.
For the reasons mentioned in the application the same is
allowed.
The hearing in the main case i.e. CRM-M-18687-2017 is preponed to today i.e. 28.09.2017.
CRM-M-18687-2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant
petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
28.09.2017
Satyawan Whether speaking/reasoned
(JAISHREE THAKUR)
JUDGE
No.
Satyawan 2017.09.28 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CRM-M-45451-2016
-2-
Whether reportable No.
Satyawan 2017.09.28 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Rohtash and another
State of Haryana and another
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court