This order dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous after a status report confirmed the underlying FIR was falsely cognizable, requiring only formality of untraced report.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to FIR being found false.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-17648-2017
Date of decision: 19.07.2017
Kaka Singh and others
..... Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Madan Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Rana Harjasdeep Singh, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. AS Cheema, Advocate for respondent No. 6.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
July 19, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2017.07.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction to investigate a false FIR should be dismissed as infructuous upon report of falsity.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kaka Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
