Allowed

Amnesh v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Jan 2017CRM-M/174/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Amnesh in an NDPS case via notice of motion. Contraband was recovered from a co-accused, not the petitioner. Bail granted subject to Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. conditions and restrictions on leaving the country.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail subject to furnishing bond and surety and complying with listed conditions including Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. and no leaving the country.

Amnesh Vs State of Haryana — Narcotics (NDPS) | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CRM-M-174 of 2017

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-174 of 2017

¶5

Date of Decision : 13.01.2017

Amnesh

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Surinder Gupta, J.

¶13

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 639 dated 19.11.2016 registered for offence punishable under Section 21 of NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station Gharaunda, District Karnal.

¶14

Heard.

¶15

Notice of motion.

¶16

On asking of the court, Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice and submits that intimation by Registry informing of fixation of the petition has already been received and record of the case is available with her.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that recovery of 8.770 milligrams of smack was effected from co-accused Sunder, who was travelling on the motorcycle of petitioner. No recovery of contraband was effected from the petitioner, who is in custody since 19.11.2016.

¶18

Learned State counsel submits that challan against the petitioner and his co-accused has since been presented by the police.

¶19

Keeping in view the above facts but without expressing any

¶20

Jitender Kumar 2017.01.14 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶21

CRM-M-174 of 2017 -2-

¶22

opinion on merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. PetitionerAmnesh is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:-

¶23

a. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶24

b. In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

¶25

c. He shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court.

¶26

January 13, 2017	( SURINDER GUPTA)
jk	JUDGE
Whether speaking/Reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶27

Jitender Kumar 2017.01.14 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Amnesh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amnesh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harbir Vs State of Haryana

Sarabjit Singh Sandhu Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Kuldeep Singh @ Tahal Singh &Ors Vs State of Punjab& Ors.

Axis Bank Ltd. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Balwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Sandeep Singh @ Deepa Vs State of Punjab