The single-judge bench allowed the petitioner's withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition, granting liberty to raise all available pleas before the appropriate forum, and subsequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of petition allowed with liberty to press all available pleas in the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-17058 of 2013 Date of decision : January 12, 2017
Narinder Singh and another
....Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Gurveer Sidhu, AAG, Punjab, for the respondent Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, for respondent No. 2
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
After arguing at length for some time, faced with the likely consequences, learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions from his client wishes to withdraw the present petition with permission to rake up all the pleas available before the appropriate forum. Allowed to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) January 12, 2017 Judge 'tiwana' Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2017.01.13 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Narinder Singh
State of Punjab
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
