Disposed

Prinsi Singh & Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC10 Jan 2017CRM-M/161/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a petition seeking protection of life and liberty for two major members who allegedly married against their parents' wishes. It directed the Superintendent of Police to examine a representation and take appropriate action without adjudicating the marriage's validity. No other relief was granted.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Superintendent of Police, Panchkula to look into representation dated 07.01.2017 and take appropriate action.

Prinsi Singh & Anr. Vs State of… — Child Custody and Guardianship | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CRM-M-161-2017

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Crl. Misc. No.M-161 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : January 10, 2017

¶5

Prinsi Singh and another

¶6

... Petitioners

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

State of Haryana and others

¶9

... Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶11

Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. Deepak K. Bartia, Advocate for Mr. Gautam Diwan, Advocate

¶12

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶13

This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No.4 and 5, parents of petitioner No.1.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 07.01.2017 (Annexure P-5) made by petitioner No.1. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1-Prinsi Singh is 15.02.1993 as per copy of Voter Identity Card (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Harikesh is 05.12.1992 as per copy of PAN Card (Annexure P-2). They got married on 18.10.2016 as per marriage certificate (Annexure P-3). Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-4.

¶15

In view of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage

¶16

Sachin Mehta 2017.01.10 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

¶17

CRM-M-161-2017

¶18

-2-

¶19

of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2Superintendent of Police, Panchkula to look into the representation dated 07.01.2017 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office.

¶20

However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them.

¶21

January 10, 2017 . Sachin M.

¶22

(SURINDER GUPTA) JUDGE

¶23

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No

¶24

Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶25

Sachin Mehta 2017.01.10 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

Prinsi Singh & Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prinsi Singh & Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Shanker Tibrewala Vs State of Haryana

Rakesh Sood Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Manpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Surjit Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Vs Harish Kumar

Santosh & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.