Single judge allowed the petition for continuation of anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. in criminal complaint No.50734 of 2013. The petitioner had previously obtained interim bail and was regularly appearing before the trial court.
The petition was allowed and the previous order dated 23.03.2017 was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No.M-1582 of 2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-1582 of 2017 Decided on: 18.09.2017
Uma Wati
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present : Mr. Vikas P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Sidhu, DAG, Punjab.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail in criminal complaint No.50734 of 2013 dated 06.06.2013 titled as Rajan Chopra vs Uma Wati.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 23.03.2017, the petitioner has already appeared before the trial Court on 28.03.2017 and the trial Court has released the petitioner on furnishing bail/surety bonds on interim bail. Counsel for the petitioner submits that since then, the petitioner is regularly appearing before the trial Court and has not misused the concession of bail.
A perusal of the report submitted by the Registry show that service of respondent No.2 is complete, however, there is no representation on his behalf.
In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 23.03.2017 is made absolute subject to the conditions
Mohd. Yakub 2017.09.19 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CRM No.M-1582 of 2017
2
envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 18.09.2017 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Mohd. Yakub 2017.09.19 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for continuation of anticipatory bail should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Uma Wati
State of Punjab
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
