Magma Fincorp Limited Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

After arguing at length for some time, faced with the likely consequences, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from his client wishes to withdraw the present petition, however, reserving the right of the petitioner to knock the jurisdiction of this Court on the same very grounds upon completion of investigation.

¶13

Mr. Sabharwal on instructions from ASI Dharamvir Singh, Police Station, Central Faridabad, has made statement that the petitioner is required for custodial interrogation. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner has opted to move appropriate court seeking relief under section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

¶15

( Fateh Deep Singh ) January 30, 2017 Judge 'tiwana'

¶16

Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2017.02.01 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

¶17

Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No

¶18

Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2017.02.01 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Magma Fincorp Limited v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Magma Fincorp Limited v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paramjit Kaur @ Pammi Vs State of Punjab

Anil Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Haryana

Hardeep Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Hardev Singh and Ors. Vs Surjit Kaur and Another

Hargulab Singh Vs State of Punjab

Gulshan Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Anr.