The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, treating the writ petition as infructuous due to the lapse of time, dismissed it without summoning counsel for oral arguments or delivering a reasoned judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
220
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-15659-2016 Date of Decision: 18.09.2017
Gurpreet Kaur ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present:Mr. A. D. S. Jattana, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. M. S. Nagra, AAG, Punjab. Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate for respondents No. 4 and 5.
JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that
during the flux of time, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(JAISHREE THAKUR) 18.09.2017 JUDGE Ansari
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Gurpreet Kaur
State of Punjab
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
