Allowed

Gagandeep Singh v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Feb 2017CRM-M/1429/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph oral order grants regular bail to the petitioner in a case arising under sections 399 and 402 IPC and sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The court relies on the bail of co-accorded granted by this Court, applies the principle of parity, and orders release on furnishing bonds. Bail is subject to standard Cr.P.C. conditions, including non-interference with court proceedings an

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, subject to specified conditions.

Gagandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CRM-M-1429 of 2017

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

CRM-M-1429 of 2017 Date of Decision: 06.02.2017

¶5

Gagandeep Singh ....Petitioner

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

State of Punjab ....Respondent

¶8

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶9

Present: Mr. Sandeep Wadhawan, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

¶11

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶12

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 74 dated 22.09.2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and 25 and 27 of Arms Act, at Police Station Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran.

¶13

Heard.

¶14

Notice of motion.

¶15

On asking of the court, Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab, who is present in the Court accepts notice and submits that intimation by Registry informing of fixation of the petition has already been received and record of the case is available with her.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused Lovepreet Singh, Harpreet Singh and Jatinder Singh have been allowed regular bail vide common order dated 16.01.2017 passed by this Court in CRM-M-43920 of 2016 and CRM-M-43960 of 2016.

¶17

Jitender Kumar 2017.02.06 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

¶18

CRM-M-1429 of 2017

¶19

-2-

¶20

Allegations against the petitioner are also similar but no recovery of any weapon was effected from him.

¶21

Applying the principle of parity but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner-Gagandeep Singh is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following

¶22

terms:-

¶23

(a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶24

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

¶25

¶26

February 06, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE

¶27

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶28

Jitender Kumar 2017.02.06 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

Gagandeep Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gagandeep Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mansi & Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Gurbachan Singh & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Davinder Pal Singh Vs State of Punjab

Ramesh Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Suraj Vs State of Haryana

Deepak @ Kalu Vs State of Haryana