Petitioner sought to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition after the counsel indicated an intention to file a regular revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C. The court permitted the withdrawal to allow the plea to be raised in the appropriate forum later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-1401 of 2017 Date of decision : January 18, 2017
Rajpal Singh
....Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the petitioner
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner faced with likely consequences wishes to withdraw the present petition with permission to rake up all the pleas available before the appropriate forum by way of revision in terms of section 397 Cr.P.C. Allowed to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) January 18, 2017 Judge 'tiwana' Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2017.01.19 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Rajpal Singh
State of Haryana
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
