Quashed

Abhishek Kumar v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC26 May 2017CRM-M/13478/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Gandhinagar bench, quashed FIR No. 911 dated 30.12.2016 under Sections 354-D/506 IPC. The quashing was based on a compromise deed dated 09.03.2017. The petitioner alleged misbehavior, harassment, and threats against the complainant. A detailed report from the Judicial Magistrate confirmed that the matter was voluntarily comp

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No. 911 dated 30.12.2016 under Sections 354-D/506 IPC and all consequential proceedings qua the petitioner.

Abhishek Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

Crl. Misc. No. M-13478-2017

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Crl. Misc. No. M-13478-2017 Date of decision : 26.05.2017

Abhishek Kumar

......Petitioner

versus

State of Haryana and anr.

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶11

Present: Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner

¶12

Mr. D.R. Singla, DAG, Haryana Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 2

¶13

¶14

RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)

¶15

Reply filed by learned State counsel, in the Court today, is taken on record.

¶16

Quashing of FIR No. 911 dated 30.12.2016 under Sections 354D/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 10-A, Gurgaon, is being sought on the basis of compromise deed dated 09.03.2017 (Annexure P-2)

¶17

The allegation against the petitioner is that he started sending message to respondent No. 2 on her mobile number and started misbehaving with her and giving threats to eliminate her.

¶18

However, at the stage of investigation, the matter has now been duly compromised, on the basis of compromise deed dated 09.03.2017 (Annexure P-2)

¶19

In compliance of order dated 21.04.2017, report dated 09.05.2017 of Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Gurugram has been received in this regard. As per report, separate statement of the complainant and GAURAV ARORA 2017.06.12 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶20

¶21

Crl. Misc. No. M-13478-2017

¶22

petitioner had been recorded and they stated that the matter has been duly compromised between them. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. The complainant has no objection if the F.I.R be quashed against the petitioner. The compromise is without any pressure, influence or coercion.

¶23

Consequently, in view of the status report dated 09.05.2017 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases of Madan

¶24

Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 429 and the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 , no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

¶25

Accordingly, FIR No. 911 dated 30.12.2016 under Sections 354-D/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 10-A, Gurgaon, is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioner.

¶26

The petition stands disposed of.

¶27

26.05.2017 G Arora

¶28

(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE

¶29

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶30

Yes

¶31

GAURAV ARORA 2017.06.12 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Abhishek Kumar v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek Kumar v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jasmandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab

Mahender Kumar Singla Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Ramesh Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Poonam Kaushik and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Gurdeep Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Som Nath Vs State of Punjab