Disposed

Kavina Rani & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Dec 2017CRM-M/1273/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge dispensed two applications. The main petition sought protection and police action against in-laws alleging dowry harassment and assault; FIR was filed after. Court directed respondent police to investigate fresh attack allegation specifically mentioned in a representation. Linked incidental impleadment application was rendered infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 (police) to look into representation dated 05.04.2017 regarding attack and take necessary action.

Kavina Rani & Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Ors. — Domestic Violence | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

Crl. Misc. No. M-1273 of 2017 (O&M) [ 1 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

Crl. Misc. No. M-1273 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : December 04, 2017

¶4

Kavina Rani and others ....................................................Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Haryana and others .......................................... Respondents

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

¶8

Present: Mr. B.S.Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶9

Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.

¶10

LISA GILL, J. (Oral)

¶11

CRM-12614 of 2017

¶12

Annexures P5 to P7 are taken on record subject to just

¶13

exceptions.

¶14

Application is disposed of.

¶15

CRM-M-1273 of 2017

¶16

The petitioners seek protection of their life and liberty at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 8. It is submitted that petitioner No.1 was married to respondent No.4-Tilak Raj on 02.012.2014. A child was born out of this wedlock. Allegations of harassment, ill-treatment and torture at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 8 were levelled. As per the averments in the petition no action was taken by the police authorities. It was thus prayed that action should be taken against the said respondents.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

Rupinder Kaur 2017.12.07 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

Crl. Misc. No. M-1273 of 2017 (O&M) [ 2 ]

¶20

It is not in dispute that FIR No. 22 dated 13.02.2017 under Sections 323, 498-A, 406, 506 IPC has since been registered at Women Police Station, Ambala, against respondents No. 4, 6 and 7. Final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C./challan has been presented against the said respondents. Therefore, no further orders are called for in this respect.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioners however submits that after registration of FIR No.22 dated 13.02.2017 when the petitioners went to village Nagla for recovery of the dowry articles along with the police officials, they were attacked by the in-laws of petitioner No.1. Representation dated 05.04.2017 (Annexure P6) in this respect was submitted. However, no action is being taken by the police authorities.

¶22

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case as above but without expressing any opinion on the merits thereof, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 05.04.2017 (Annexure P6) and take appropriate action as may be/if any, required, in accordance with law.

¶23

None of the observations made here-in-above shall be construed to be a reflection on merits of the case and shall have no bearing thereon.

¶24

CRM-12613 of 2017

¶25

As the petition has been disposed of, this application for impleading respondent No.3A has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of accordingly.

¶26

( LISA GILL ) 04.12.2017 JUDGE rupi

¶27

Note: Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable: Yes / No

¶28

Rupinder Kaur 2017.12.07 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Kavina Rani & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kavina Rani & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashwani Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Bishal Sutti Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Ashwani Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Karamjit Singh @ Rinku and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Rajesh Chaudhary & Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Jasvir Singh @ Veeru @ Seera Vs State of Punjab