Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal petition after prosecution evidence closed. The plea was dismissed as withdrawn, but the trial court was directed to expedite disposal within one month of defence evidence closure.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; trial court directed to expedite disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-12414 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 28, 2017
Jarnail Singh @ Cherry
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Punjab
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Gagandeep Singh Simble, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Mr. Luvinder Sofat, A.A.G. Punjab. *******
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prosecution evidence has been completed in this case and seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the disposal of the case at the earliest, preferably within a period of one month from the
date defence evidence is closed.
September 28, 2017 Jyoti-II
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Jyoti 2017.09.28 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
Jarnail Singh @ Cherry
State of Punjab
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
