Dismissed
Deepak Kaushal v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/12400/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-12400 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 01, 2017
Deepak Kaushal
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr.Paras Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, Sr.DAG, Punjab for the respondent-State.
Mr.Ajaivir Singh, Advocate for the complainant.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
For detailed order, see order passed in CRM No.M-9000 of 2017 titled as Vishal Sharawat alias Taddi vs. State of Punjab of even
date.
August 01, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Vineet Gulati 2017.08.18 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vishal Sharawat alias Taddi vs. State of PunjabReferred¶14
CRM No.M-9000 of 2017
Deepak Kaushal
State of Punjab
INDERJIT SINGH
Vineet Gulati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court