Petitioner deferred to a separate order decided on the same date in a related petition. The court issued a one-line oral order referencing that order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11978-2015 Date of Decision: - 06.03.2017
Simarjit Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: None for petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Sekhon, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. D.K. Bhatti, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 and 6.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
For detailed order, see CRM-M-10811-2015 titled Manisha
Vs . State of Punjab and others, decided vide separate order of even date,
by this Court.
March 06, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | No |
Naresh Kumar 2017.03.08 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Simarjit Kaur
State of Punjab
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
