The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition on behalf of the petitioners, with liberty to file a fresh criminal revision on the same grounds.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh criminal revision on the same grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-11614 of 2015 Date of decision : January 12, 2017
M/s Babbu Knitwears and another
....Petitioners
versus
Savita Bhanot ....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : Mr.Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Vikas Mehsampuri, Advocate, for the respondent
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
After arguing at length for some time, faced with the likely consequences, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from his client wishes to withdraw the present petition, however, reserving the right of the petitioners to file a criminal revision on same very grounds afresh. Allowed to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) January 12, 2017 Judge 'tiwana' Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2017.01.13 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
M/s Babbu Knitwears and another
Savita Bhanot
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
