Allowed

Vijay Kumar and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC23 May 2017CRM-M/10596/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. arising from an FIR under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, the High Court, noting that petitioners joined investigation and faced no custodial interrogation, made the ad-interim bail absolute and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim anticipatory bail made absolute; petitioners to join investigation as required and abide by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Vijay Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Punjab — Anticipatory Bail | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CRM-M-10596-2017 (O&M)

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-10596-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 23.05.2017

¶5

Vijay Kumar and another

....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶11

Present: Mr. Damanjit Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. AGS Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶12

Ms. Manpreet Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab.

¶13

¶14

RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)

¶15

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, in a case arising out of FIR No.7 dated 16.01.2017, under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Women Cell Patiala, District Patiala.

¶16

At the very outset, learned State counsel, on instructions from investigating officer, has informed that in pursuance of order dated 29.03.2017 of this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation on 10.04.2017 and their custodial interrogation is not required at this stage.

¶17

In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the

¶18

case, order dated 29.03.2017, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim Naresh Kumar 2017.05.24 15:59 I attest to the accuracy andanticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners is made absolute. The integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

-2-

¶20

CRM-M-10596-2017 (O&M)

¶21

petitioners shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶22

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.

¶23

May 23, 2017			(RITU BAHRI )
naresh.k			JUDGE
	Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes
	Whether reportable	No

¶24

Naresh Kumar 2017.05.24 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Vijay Kumar and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Ajay Sharma @ Ramdhan Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Shyam Sunder Vs State of Haryana

Ajay Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Balwinder Singh Alias Binda Vs State of Punjab

Kuldeep Singh & Anr. Vs State of Punjab