Petitioner's bail petition made absolute after she surrendered, furnished bonds, and had them accepted by the trial Court. Court disposed of the petition with a direction to abide by trial Court conditions.
The order dated 27.03.2017 making the petitioner appear for trial Court was made absolute; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-10316 of 2017 Date of Decision:- 18.05.2017
Navneet Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. H.S. Randhawa, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Manpreet Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that vide order dated 27.03.2017 of this Court, the petitioner was directed to appear/surrender before the learned trial Court and the trial Court was required to admit her to interim bail.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petiitoner has placed on record the certified copy of order dated 01.05.2017, which would reveal that the petitioner has appeared and bail & surety bonds furnished by her, in pursuance of the pointed order of this Court, were attested and accepted by the trial Court.
Considering the fact that the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court, the order dated 27.03.2017 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute and accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.
However, the petitioner shall be bound by the conditions imposed by the trial Court.
May 18, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Naresh Kumar 2017.05.19 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Navneet Kaur
State of Punjab
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
