Petitioner sought withdrawal of the Criminal Revision petition; the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Application for withdrawal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
212
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-10091 of 2017 Date of decision: 01.11.2017
Naveen
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Naveen Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
01.11.2017
yakub
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Mohd. Yakub 2017.11.02 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Naveen
State of Haryana
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
