Gurcharan Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What did the court decide?
The order of ad-interim anticipatory bail granted on 22.03.2016 was made absolute.
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
The order of ad-interim anticipatory bail granted on 22.03.2016 was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-10024-2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-10024-2016 Date of Decision:- 11.05.2017
Gurcharan Singh and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. J.S. Jaidka, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. APS Gill, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Paras Talwar, Advocate for complainant-respondent No.2.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.10 dated 01.02.2015, registered at Police Station Women Cell, District Ludhiana, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 406, 498-A and 323 IPC.
Learned State counsel, on instructions, has informed that SLP against the order dated 28.11.2016, passed by this Court, has been dismissed by the Supreme Court on 04.05.2017.
Naresh Kumar 2017.05.18 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M-10024-2016
-2-
Keeping in view the fact that sister of the complainant is staying happily along with her two minor daughters in the room provided to her, order dated 22.03.2016, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners is made absolute. The petitioners shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.
May 11, 2017 naresh.k
( RITU BAHRI ) JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | No |
Naresh Kumar 2017.05.18 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order granting ad-interim anticipatory bail in FIR No.10 should be made absolute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurcharan Singh
State of Punjab
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court