This is a condensed order where the High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the appeal by expressly referring to the detailed order passed in a related criminal revision application decided on the same date on an identical matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRA No.S-3250 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 06, 2017
Sachin Gupta and another
...Appellants
VERSUS
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Vikram Bali, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
For detailed order, see order passed in CRA No.S-2662-SB of
2015 titled as Sanjeev vs. State of Haryana of even date.
March 06, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Vineet Gulati 2017.03.15 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sanjeev vs. State of HaryanaReferred¶13
CRA No.S-2662-SB of 2015 titled as Sanjeev vs. State of Haryana
Sachin Gupta
State of Haryana
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
