Ashok Kumar Bansal v. Prabhjot Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.8049 of 2015 Date of decision: 27.02.2017
Ashok Kumar Bansal
..Petitioner
Versus
Prabhjot Singh
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Ms. Loveleen Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the respondent.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present revision petition has become infructuous as the matter has been compromised between the parties and on the basis of compromise, order of eviction has been passed.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
27.02.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No
Neetu Rani 2017.03.01 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Ashok Kumar Bansal
Prabhjot Singh
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court