The Criminal Miscellaneous petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the last hearing date and subsequent dates despite due notice.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-4504-2013 (O & M) Date of decision: 12.01.2017
Maman Chand
…. Petitioner
V/s
Ram Rati and ors.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
On the last date of hearing, following order was passed in this
case:-
“ None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Similar was the situation on the last two dates of hearing. As per the report received from Registry, counsel has been informed telephonically also. It appears that case needs to be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Purely, in the interest of justice, adjourned to 12.01.2017.”
Petitioner remains unrepresented today as well.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
January 12, 2017 sukhpreet
Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.01.17 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Maman Chand
Ram Rati and ors.
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
