The civil revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioners, who realized the court was not inclined to grant relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No.3650 of 2017 Date of Decision: 07.07.2017
Pritam Singh and others
..Petitioners
versus
Parkash Kaur and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Ms. Sarika Gupta, Advocate, for Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J.
After arguing the case for some time and realising that the court
is not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
07.07.2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) VK JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether Reportable Yes/No
Virender Kumar 2017.07.10 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Pritam Singh
Parkash Kaur
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
