The court disposed of a contempt petition alleging violation of an order directing the respondent-State to release dues within three months. The court directed respondents to comply within two months under threat of exemplary costs.
Direction to respondents to do the needful to purge contempt within 2 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-875-2016 (O & M) Date of decision: 27.07.2017
Hans Raj Mahila Mahavidhyala, Jalandhar
….Petitioner
V/s
Dr. Roshan Sunkaria, IAS, and anr.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. I.P.S. Doabia, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Petitioner has filed this contempt petition alleging violation of order dated 06.05.2015 passed by the writ court whereby respondent-State was directed to release the dues of the petitioner within a period of three months.
Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to do the needful to purge the contempt within 02 months from today. In case, needful is not done, petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of this petition. In such eventuality, this court shall consider imposition of exemplary costs on such respondents who have failed to comply with the order. Needless to observe such costs would be deductible from the salary of the responsible officials.
(RAJAN GUPTA) July 27, 2017 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.07.31 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents failed to comply with the earlier order directing release of dues.
Whether to impose exemplary costs on respondents failing to comply with the order.
Hans Raj Mahila Mahavidhyala
Dr. Roshan Sunkaria
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
