Petitioners challenged proceedings in a departmental promotion committee. Court found that the respondent explained non-eligibility and committed to providing the rejected orders. Petition is disposed without further direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 2852 of 2012
Date of decision : 24.07.2017
Karnail Singh & ors.
....Petitioners
V/s
Hussan Lal
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. G.P. Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Vikas Mohan Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Learned State counsel at the outset submits that meeting of departmental promotion committee was held on 12.06.2017. In the proceedings, certain persons have been promoted as Principal. However, petitioners were not found eligible. Thus, their claim has been rejected. He further submits that orders passed as well as the proceedings of the committee shall be supplied to counsel for the petitioners at the earliest, in any case not later than three weeks.
In view of above, no further direction in the contempt petition is necessary. Same is hereby disposed of. Petitioners shall be at liberty to seek revival thereof in case any cause of action survives, alternatively they may avail any efficacious remedy.
July 24, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ajay Kumar 2017.07.25 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Karnail Singh & ors.
Husan Lal
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
