Petitioner Darshan Singh sought to withdraw COCP No.2015 of 2017 with liberty to file a fresh petition upon providing better particulars. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn subject to the granted liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2015 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.07.2017
Darshan Singh
..Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Navraj Sandhu and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this
petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
28.07.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
Neetu Rani 2017.08.01 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Darshan Singh
Smt. Navraj Sandhu and others
Daya Chaudhary
Neetu Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
