The judgment is not reported as a speaking order. It directs the investigation of a detailed order in RSA No.707 of 2007 dated the same day. No legal issue was discussed, decided, or cited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.708 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision.06.10.2016
Ramesh Kumar
.......Appellant
Vs
Parkash and others ........Respondents
Present: Mr. S.C. Chhabra, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. S.M. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.
None for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
For detailed order, see order passed in RSA No.707 of 2007 of
even date.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE October 06, 2016 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.10.18 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ramesh Kumar
Parkash
others
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
