The judgment is an oral order dismissing a reference to RSA No.2883 of 2013 of even date without any substantive reasoning or decision on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.2073 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision.08.09.2016
Kuldeep Singh
.......Appellant
Vs.
Ramtej Singh and others ........Respondents
Present: Mr. L.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Alisha Soni, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate for respondent No.3.
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
For detailed order, see order passed in RSA No.2883 of 2013 of
even date.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 08, 2016 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.09.21 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kuldeep Singh
Ramtej Singh
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
